In Starfield, the Core i7-4820K is slightly slower than the Core i7-14700F. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $103 cheaper!
Core i7-4820K
- Up to 34% cheaper – $199.88 vs $302.97
- Up to 34% cheaper
- Up to 29% better value in Starfield – $2.19 vs $3.09/FPS
- Up to 29% better value in Starfield
Core i7-14700F
- Up to 8% faster in Starfield – 98 vs 91 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in Starfield
- Is 10 years and 4 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 10 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Starfield FPS Calculator
Core i7-4820K vs Core i7-14700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-4820K
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
91 FPS
93%
Min 1% FPS
50 FPS
76%
Price, $
$199.88
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.19/FPS
100%
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
98 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
66 FPS
100%
Price, $
$302.97
65%
Value, $/FPS
$3.09/FPS
71%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4820K vs Core i7-14700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4820K vs Core i7-14700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4820K
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
10 MB
30%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
72%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
33 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
57%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4820K Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-14700F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $359.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
