In Atomfall, the Core i7-4820K is slightly slower than the Core i7-11700F. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $68 cheaper!
Core i7-4820K
- Up to 29% cheaper – $168.02 vs $235.99
- Up to 29% cheaper
- Up to 17% better value in Atomfall – $0.86 vs $1.04/FPS
- Up to 17% better value in Atomfall
Core i7-11700F
- Up to 16% faster in Atomfall – 226 vs 194 FPS
- Up to 16% faster in Atomfall
- Is 7 years and 6 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 7 years and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-4820K vs Core i7-11700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-4820K
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
194 FPS
86%
Min 1% FPS
145 FPS
86%
Price, $
$168.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.86/FPS
100%
Core i7-11700F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
226 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
169 FPS
100%
Price, $
$235.99
71%
Value, $/FPS
$1.04/FPS
83%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4820K vs Core i7-11700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4820K vs Core i7-11700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4820K
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
10 MB
62%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
80%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-11700F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4820K Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-11700F Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $298.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
