In Rust, the Core i7-4820K is slightly slower than the Core i5-9600KF. However, it's a slightly better value for money, as it's $20 cheaper!
Core i7-4820K
- Up to 9% cheaper – $199.88 vs $219.88
- Up to 9% cheaper
- Up to 1% better value in Rust – $0.94 vs $0.95/FPS
- Up to 1% better value in Rust
Core i5-9600KF
- Up to 9% faster in Rust – 231 vs 212 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in Rust
- Is 5 years and 4 months newer – Jan 08, 2019 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 5 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 27% less energy – 95 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 27% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i7-4820K vs Core i5-9600KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-4820K
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
212 FPS
92%
Min 1% FPS
43 FPS
74%
Price, $
$199.88
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.94/FPS
100%
Core i5-9600KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
231 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
58 FPS
100%
Price, $
$219.88
90%
Value, $/FPS
$0.95/FPS
99%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4820K vs Core i5-9600KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4820K vs Core i5-9600KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4820K
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
10 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
85%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-9600KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
90%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4820K Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9600KF Jan 8th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
