In Minecraft, the Core i7-4820K is slightly slower than the Core i5-13400F. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $64 cheaper!
Core i7-4820K
- Up to 28% cheaper – $168.02 vs $231.99
- Up to 28% cheaper
- Up to 25% better value in Minecraft – $0.15 vs $0.20/FPS
- Up to 25% better value in Minecraft
Core i5-13400F
- Up to 6% faster in Minecraft – 1126 vs 1059 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Minecraft
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Minecraft FPS Calculator
Core i7-4820K vs Core i5-13400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-4820K
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
1059 FPS
94%
Min 1% FPS
194 FPS
66%
Price, $
$168.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.15/FPS
100%
Core i5-13400F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
1126 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
296 FPS
100%
Price, $
$231.99
72%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
75%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4820K vs Core i5-13400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4820K vs Core i5-13400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4820K
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
10 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
85%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-13400F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4820K Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-13400F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $196.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
