In Minecraft, the Core i7-4820K is slightly slower than the Core i3-14100F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $103 more expensive!
Core i7-4820K
No clear advantages
Core i3-14100F
- Up to 6% faster in Minecraft – 1124 vs 1060 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Minecraft
- Is 10 years and 4 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 10 years and 4 months newer
- Up to 51% cheaper – $96.99 vs $199.88
- Up to 51% cheaper
- Up to 56% better value in Minecraft – $0.08 vs $0.18/FPS
- Up to 56% better value in Minecraft
- Consumes up to 55% less energy – 58 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 55% less energy
Minecraft FPS Calculator
Core i7-4820K vs Core i3-14100F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-4820K
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
1060 FPS
94%
Min 1% FPS
197 FPS
67%
Price, $
$199.88
48%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
44%
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
1124 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
294 FPS
100%
Price, $
$96.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.08/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4820K vs Core i3-14100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4820K vs Core i3-14100F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4820K
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
10 MB
83%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
83%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4820K Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $109.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 58 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
