The Core i7-4820K is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-14100F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $109.79 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i7-4820K
The Core i3-14100F is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i3-14100F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 55% cheaper – $90.09 vs $199.88
- A much better value for money for gaming
Core i7-4820K vs Core i3-14100F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-4820K
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
171
82%
Min 1% FPS
115
84%
Price, $
$199.88
45%
Value, $/FPS
$1.16/FPS
37%
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
208
100%
Min 1% FPS
137
100%
Price, $
$90.09
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Core i7-4820K vs Core i3-14100F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4820K vs Core i3-14100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4820K vs Core i3-14100F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4820K
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
10 MB
83%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
83%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-4820K | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-14100F |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Not Available | MSRP | $109.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
130 W | Power Consumption | Not Available |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.7 GHz |
10 MB | L3 Cache | 12 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 4800 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | No |