The Core i7-4820K is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-10105F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $53.94 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i7-4820K
The Core i3-10105F is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i3-10105F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 54% cheaper – $45.06 vs $99.00
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
Core i7-4820K vs Core i3-10105F
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
204
100%
Min 1% FPS
139
100%
Price, $
$45.06
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.22/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4820K vs Core i3-10105F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4820K vs Core i3-10105F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4820K
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
10 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
89%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
60%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-4820K | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-10105F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $97.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
| Ivy Bridge-E | Codename | Comet Lake-R |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.4 GHz |
10 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
