In Atomfall, the Core i7-4810MQ is slower than the Core i7-13700KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4810MQ
- Consumes up to 62% less energy – 47 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 62% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-13700KF
- Up to 21% faster in Atomfall – 244 vs 202 FPS
- Up to 21% faster in Atomfall
- Is 8 years and 8 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Jan 20, 2014
- Is 8 years and 8 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-4810MQ vs Core i7-13700KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-13700KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
244 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
183 FPS
100%
Price, $
$582.72
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.38/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4810MQ vs Core i7-13700KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4810MQ vs Core i7-13700KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4810MQ
Jan 20th, 2014
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
6 MB
20%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
70%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
29%
Core i7-13700KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4810MQ Jan 20th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-13700KF Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 20th, 2014 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
$378.00 | MSRP | $384.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG3 | Socket | LGA1700 |
47 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
