In Atomfall, the Core i7-4810MQ is slightly faster than the Core i3-370M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4810MQ
- Up to 10% faster in Atomfall – 202 vs 183 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer – Jan 20, 2014 vs Jun 20, 2010
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer
Core i3-370M
- Consumes up to 26% less energy – 35 vs 47 Watts
- Consumes up to 26% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-4810MQ vs Core i3-370M: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4810MQ vs Core i3-370M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4810MQ vs Core i3-370M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4810MQ
Jan 20th, 2014
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Core i3-370M
Jun 20th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4810MQ Jan 20th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-370M Jun 20th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 20th, 2014 | Released | Jun 20th, 2010 |
| $378.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGAG3 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 47 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
