In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i7-4790T is slightly slower than the Xeon X3450. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4790T
- Is 4 years and 7 months newer – May 01, 2014 vs Sep 08, 2009
- Is 4 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 53% less energy – 45 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 53% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon X3450
- Up to 11% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 198 vs 178 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i7-4790T vs Xeon X3450: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-4790T
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
178 FPS
90%
Min 1% FPS
133 FPS
90%
Price, $
$149.88
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.84/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4790T vs Xeon X3450 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4790T vs Xeon X3450 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4790T
May 1st, 2014
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Xeon X3450
Sep 8th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.667 GHz
99%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
82%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
83%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4790T May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X3450 Sep 8th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 1st, 2014 | Released | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | $241.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1156 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
