In Rust, the Core i7-4790T is slower than the Core Ultra 9 285. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $384 cheaper!
Core i7-4790T
- Up to 72% cheaper – $149.88 vs $534.00
- Up to 72% cheaper
- Up to 64% better value in Rust – $0.68 vs $1.88/FPS
- Up to 64% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
Core Ultra 9 285
- Up to 29% faster in Rust – 283 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 29% faster in Rust
- Is 10 years and 8 months newer – Jan 27, 2025 vs May 01, 2014
- Is 10 years and 8 months newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i7-4790T vs Core Ultra 9 285: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-4790T
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
220 FPS
78%
Min 1% FPS
50 FPS
53%
Price, $
$149.88
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 27th, 2025
Average FPS
283 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
94 FPS
100%
Price, $
$534
28%
Value, $/FPS
$1.88/FPS
36%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4790T vs Core Ultra 9 285 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4790T vs Core Ultra 9 285 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4790T
May 1st, 2014
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
70%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
25%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 27th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4790T May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285 Jan 27th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 27th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $579.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1851 |
45W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
