In Rust, the Core i7-4790T is slightly faster than the Core i5-650. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $87 more expensive!
Core i7-4790T
- Up to 6% faster in Rust – 221 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Rust
- Is 4 years and 3 months newer – May 01, 2014 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 4 years and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 38% less energy – 45 vs 73 Watts
- Consumes up to 38% less energy
Core i5-650
- Up to 58% cheaper – $63.33 vs $149.88
- Up to 58% cheaper
- Up to 55% better value in Rust – $0.30 vs $0.67/FPS
- Up to 55% better value in Rust
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i7-4790T vs Core i5-650: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-4790T
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
221 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
51 FPS
100%
Price, $
$149.88
42%
Value, $/FPS
$0.67/FPS
45%
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
209 FPS
95%
Min 1% FPS
40 FPS
78%
Price, $
$63.33
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4790T vs Core i5-650 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4790T vs Core i5-650 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4790T
May 1st, 2014
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
89%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
83%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4790T May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-650 Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 1st, 2014 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | $176.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1156 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 73 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
