In Atomfall, the Core i7-4790T is slightly faster than the Core i3-4130. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $109 more expensive!
Core i7-4790T
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall – 205 vs 200 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall
- Is 7 months and 28 days newer – May 01, 2014 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 7 months and 28 days newer
- Consumes up to 17% less energy – 45 vs 54 Watts
- Consumes up to 17% less energy
Core i3-4130
- Up to 73% cheaper – $41.00 vs $149.88
- Up to 73% cheaper
- Up to 73% better value in Atomfall – $0.20 vs $0.73/FPS
- Up to 73% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-4790T vs Core i3-4130: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-4790T
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
205 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
153 FPS
100%
Price, $
$149.88
27%
Value, $/FPS
$0.73/FPS
27%
Core i3-4130
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
200 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
150 FPS
98%
Price, $
$41
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4790T vs Core i3-4130 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4790T vs Core i3-4130 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4790T
May 1st, 2014
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Core i3-4130
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4790T May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-4130 Sep 1st, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 1st, 2014 | Released | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1150 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 54 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4400 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
