The Core i7-4790S is a slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G, however, it's a much better value for money, as it's $115.67 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i7-4790S
- Up to 62% cheaper – $71.83 vs $187.50
- A much better value for money for gaming
Advantages of the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 12 vs 8 threads
Core i7-4790S vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-4790S
May 11th, 2014
Average FPS
182
96%
Min 1% FPS
121
97%
Price, $
$71.83
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
Jul 21st, 2020
Average FPS
189
100%
Min 1% FPS
125
100%
Price, $
$187.5
38%
Value, $/FPS
$0.99/FPS
39%
Core i7-4790S vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4790S vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4790S vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4790S
May 11th, 2014
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
95%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
50%
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
Jul 21st, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.701 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-4790S | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G |
---|---|---|
General | ||
May 11th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
$312.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Haswell | Codename | Renoir |
65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 @ 1600 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
No | Overclockable | No |