In Rust, the Core i7-4785T is slightly slower than the Core i7-10700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4785T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-10700F
- Up to 8% faster in Rust – 234 vs 216 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in Rust
- Is 6 years and 10 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jun 02, 2013
- Is 6 years and 10 months newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i7-4785T vs Core i7-10700F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
234 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
60 FPS
100%
Price, $
$329.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.41/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4785T vs Core i7-10700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4785T vs Core i7-10700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4785T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
67%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
55%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4785T Jun 2nd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $303.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
