The Core i7-4771 is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Pentium G640, however, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $123.73 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i7-4771
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of the Pentium G640
- Up to 84% cheaper – $24.29 vs $148.02
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 23% less energy – 65 vs 84 Watts
Core i7-4771 vs Pentium G640 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-4771
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
182
100%
Min 1% FPS
121
100%
Price, $
$148.02
16%
Value, $/FPS
$0.81/FPS
17%
Pentium G640
Jun 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
167
92%
Min 1% FPS
112
93%
Price, $
$24.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.14/FPS
100%
Core i7-4771 vs Pentium G640 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4771 vs Pentium G640 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4771 vs Pentium G640 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4771
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Pentium G640
Jun 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-4771 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Pentium G640 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 3rd, 2012 |
$320.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Haswell | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
84 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 3 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 @ 1600 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |