In Control, the Core i7-4771 is slightly faster than the Core i3-3210 and it's also a slightly better value for money, as it's $11 cheaper!
Core i7-4771
- Up to 1% faster in Control – 248 vs 246 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Control
- Is 7 months and 29 days newer – Sep 01, 2013 vs Jan 01, 2013
- Is 7 months and 29 days newer
- Up to 7% cheaper – $148.02 vs $159.00
- Up to 7% cheaper
- Up to 8% better value in Control – $0.59 vs $0.64/FPS
- Up to 8% better value in Control
Core i3-3210
- Consumes up to 35% less energy – 55 vs 84 Watts
- Consumes up to 35% less energy
Control FPS Calculator
Core i7-4771 vs Core i3-3210: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-4771
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
100%
Price, $
$148.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
100%
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Average FPS
246 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
161 FPS
99%
Price, $
$159
93%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
92%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4771 vs Core i3-3210 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4771 vs Core i3-3210 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4771
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4771 Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-3210 Jan 1st, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Jan 1st, 2013 |
| $320.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1155 |
| 84 W | Power Consumption | 55 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 2500 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
