The Core i7-4770S is the comparison's loser – it's a slightly slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-6700T and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $20.00 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i7-4770S
The Core i7-6700T is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i7-6700T
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 20% cheaper – $79.00 vs $99.00
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
Core i7-4770S vs Core i7-6700T for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-6700T
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
202
100%
Min 1% FPS
140
100%
Price, $
$79
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Core i7-4770S vs Core i7-6700T in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4770S vs Core i7-6700T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4770S vs Core i7-6700T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4770S
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
75%
Core i7-6700T
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
90%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
92%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-4770S | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-6700T |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| $305.00 | MSRP | $303.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1600 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 2133 MHz, DDR4 @ 2133 MHz |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
