In Atomfall, the Core i7-4770S is slightly slower than the Core i3-10105F and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's $8 more expensive!
Core i7-4770S
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i3-10105F
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall – 211 vs 204 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall
- Is 7 years and 9 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Jun 02, 2013
- Is 7 years and 9 months newer
- Up to 5% cheaper – $138.99 vs $146.79
- Up to 5% cheaper
- Up to 8% better value in Atomfall – $0.65 vs $0.71/FPS
- Up to 8% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-4770S vs Core i3-10105F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-4770S
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
204 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
153 FPS
97%
Price, $
$146.79
94%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
92%
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
211 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
158 FPS
100%
Price, $
$138.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.65/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4770S vs Core i3-10105F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4770S vs Core i3-10105F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4770S
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
89%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
60%
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4770S Jun 2nd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-10105F Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| $305.00 | MSRP | $97.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
