The Core i7-4770S is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Celeron G4900 and it's also a better value for money, as it's only $9.31 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i7-4770S
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of the Celeron G4900
- Up to 9% cheaper – $89.69 vs $99.00
- Consumes up to 17% less energy – 54 vs 65 Watts
Core i7-4770S vs Celeron G4900 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron G4900
Apr 3rd, 2018
Average FPS
190
95%
Min 1% FPS
134
96%
Price, $
$89.69
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
Core i7-4770S vs Celeron G4900 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4770S vs Celeron G4900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4770S vs Celeron G4900 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4770S
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
67%
Celeron G4900
Apr 3rd, 2018
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-4770S | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| $305.00 | MSRP | $42.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 54 W |
| Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 2 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1600 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
