In Rust, the Core i7-4770HQ is slightly slower than the Core i9-10900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4770HQ
- Consumes up to 28% less energy – 47 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 28% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-10900F
- Up to 9% faster in Rust – 237 vs 217 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in Rust
- Is 5 years and 9 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jul 01, 2014
- Is 5 years and 9 months newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i7-4770HQ vs Core i9-10900F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
237 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
63 FPS
100%
Price, $
$280
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.18/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4770HQ vs Core i9-10900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4770HQ vs Core i9-10900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4770HQ
Jul 1st, 2014
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
6 MB
30%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
65%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
55%
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4770HQ Jul 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 1st, 2014 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | $464.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | LGA1200 |
47 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 5200 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
