In Deathloop, the Core i7-4770HQ is slightly slower than the Core i3-10105F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4770HQ
- Consumes up to 28% less energy – 47 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 28% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i3-10105F
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 220 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Is 6 years and 8 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Jul 01, 2014
- Is 6 years and 8 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i7-4770HQ vs Core i3-10105F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
220 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
100%
Price, $
$109
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4770HQ vs Core i3-10105F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4770HQ vs Core i3-10105F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4770HQ
Jul 1st, 2014
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
59%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
77%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
60%
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4770HQ Jul 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-10105F Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 1st, 2014 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $97.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | LGA1200 |
47 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 5200 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
