In Atomfall, the Core i7-4770 is slower than the Core Ultra 9 285. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $364 cheaper!
Core i7-4770
- Up to 65% cheaper – $198.95 vs $563.41
- Up to 65% cheaper
- Up to 57% better value in Atomfall – $0.97 vs $2.27/FPS
- Up to 57% better value in Atomfall
Core Ultra 9 285
- Up to 21% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 205 FPS
- Up to 21% faster in Atomfall
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer – Jan 14, 2025 vs Jun 02, 2013
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 23% less energy – 65 vs 84 Watts
- Consumes up to 23% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-4770 vs Core Ultra 9 285: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-4770
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
205 FPS
83%
Min 1% FPS
154 FPS
83%
Price, $
$198.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.97/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 14th, 2025
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$563.41
35%
Value, $/FPS
$2.27/FPS
43%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4770 vs Core Ultra 9 285 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4770 vs Core Ultra 9 285 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4770
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
70%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
25%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 14th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4770 Jun 2nd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285 Jan 14th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Released | Jan 14th, 2025 |
$312.00 | MSRP | $579.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 84 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
