In Deathloop, the Core i7-4770 is slightly slower than the Core i3-3220T and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's $9 more expensive!
Core i7-4770
- Is 8 months and 28 days newer – Jun 02, 2013 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 8 months and 28 days newer
Core i3-3220T
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop – 223 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop
- Up to 5% cheaper – $189.95 vs $198.95
- Up to 5% cheaper
- Up to 6% better value in Deathloop – $0.85 vs $0.90/FPS
- Up to 6% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 58% less energy – 35 vs 84 Watts
- Consumes up to 58% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i7-4770 vs Core i3-3220T: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-4770
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
219 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
98%
Price, $
$198.95
95%
Value, $/FPS
$0.9/FPS
94%
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
223 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
100%
Price, $
$189.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.85/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4770 vs Core i3-3220T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4770 vs Core i3-3220T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4770
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4770 Jun 2nd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-3220T Sep 3rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Released | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| $312.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1155 |
| 84 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 2500 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
