In Deathloop, the Core i7-4765T is slightly slower than the Xeon E5630. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4765T
- Is 3 years and 2 months newer – Jun 02, 2013 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 3 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 35 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5630
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop – 223 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i7-4765T vs Xeon E5630: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-4765T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
218 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
98%
Price, $
$498.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.28/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4765T vs Xeon E5630 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4765T vs Xeon E5630 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4765T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Xeon E5630
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
93%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4765T Jun 2nd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5630 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Released | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| $303.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1366 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 80 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
