Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms the more expensive Core i7-4765T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 2713 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-4765T.
Advantages of Core i7-4765T
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 14% better in Ready or Not than Core i7-4765T - 287 vs 251 FPS
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i7-4765T - $294.95 vs $357.09
- Up to 27% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i7-4765T - $1.03 vs $1.42 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4765T - 24 vs 8 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $357.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6800 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
287
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.03/FPS
100%
Price, $
$294.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $294.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6799 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-4765T | vs | Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |