In Atomfall, the Core i7-4765T is slower than the Core Ultra 9 285 and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's only $61 cheaper!
Core i7-4765T
- Up to 11% cheaper – $498.95 vs $560.00
- Up to 11% cheaper
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core Ultra 9 285
- Up to 25% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 199 FPS
- Up to 25% faster in Atomfall
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer – Jan 16, 2025 vs Jun 02, 2013
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer
- Up to 10% better value in Atomfall – $2.25 vs $2.50/FPS
- Up to 10% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-4765T vs Core Ultra 9 285: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-4765T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
199 FPS
80%
Min 1% FPS
149 FPS
80%
Price, $
$498.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.5/FPS
90%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 16th, 2025
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$560
89%
Value, $/FPS
$2.25/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4765T vs Core Ultra 9 285 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4765T vs Core Ultra 9 285 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4765T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
54%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
25%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 16th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4765T Jun 2nd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285 Jan 16th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Released | Jan 16th, 2025 |
$303.00 | MSRP | $579.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1851 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
