In Rust, the Core i7-4765T is slower than the Core i9-13900K and it's also a worse value for money, as it's only $50 cheaper!
Core i7-4765T
- Up to 9% cheaper – $498.95 vs $548.89
- Up to 9% cheaper
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core i9-13900K
- Up to 30% faster in Rust – 280 vs 216 FPS
- Up to 30% faster in Rust
- Is 9 years and 3 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Jun 02, 2013
- Is 9 years and 3 months newer
- Up to 15% better value in Rust – $1.96 vs $2.30/FPS
- Up to 15% better value in Rust
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i7-4765T vs Core i9-13900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-4765T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
216 FPS
77%
Min 1% FPS
48 FPS
53%
Price, $
$498.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.3/FPS
85%
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
280 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
91 FPS
100%
Price, $
$548.89
90%
Value, $/FPS
$1.96/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4765T vs Core i9-13900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4765T vs Core i9-13900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4765T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
52%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
29%
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4765T Jun 2nd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900K Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
$303.00 | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
