In Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, the Core i7-4765T is slower than the Core i5-13400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4765T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-13400F
- Up to 22% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 – 117 vs 96 FPS
- Up to 22% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
- Is 9 years and 7 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Jun 02, 2013
- Is 9 years and 7 months newer
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 FPS Calculator
Core i7-4765T vs Core i5-13400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-4765T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
96 FPS
82%
Min 1% FPS
69 FPS
78%
Price, $
$498.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.19/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4765T vs Core i5-13400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4765T vs Core i5-13400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4765T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
8 MB
40%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
65%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
33%
Core i5-13400F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4765T Jun 2nd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-13400F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| $303.00 | MSRP | $196.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
