In Atomfall, the Core i7-4765T is slightly faster than the Core i3-4130. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $458 more expensive!
Core i7-4765T
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 200 vs 199 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 35% less energy – 35 vs 54 Watts
- Consumes up to 35% less energy
Core i3-4130
- Is 2 months and 30 days newer – Sep 01, 2013 vs Jun 02, 2013
- Is 2 months and 30 days newer
- Up to 92% cheaper – $41.00 vs $498.95
- Up to 92% cheaper
- Up to 92% better value in Atomfall – $0.20 vs $2.49/FPS
- Up to 92% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-4765T vs Core i3-4130: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-4765T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
200 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
150 FPS
100%
Price, $
$498.95
8%
Value, $/FPS
$2.49/FPS
8%
Core i3-4130
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
199 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
149 FPS
99%
Price, $
$41
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4765T vs Core i3-4130 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4765T vs Core i3-4130 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4765T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
59%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Core i3-4130
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4765T Jun 2nd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-4130 Sep 1st, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Released | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| $303.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1150 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 54 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4400 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
