In Deathloop, the Core i7-4765T is slightly slower than the Core i3-380M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4765T
- Is 2 years and 7 months newer – Jun 02, 2013 vs Oct 26, 2010
- Is 2 years and 7 months newer
Core i3-380M
- Up to 4% faster in Deathloop – 226 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i7-4765T vs Core i3-380M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-4765T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
218 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
96%
Price, $
$498.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.28/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4765T vs Core i3-380M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4765T vs Core i3-380M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4765T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Core i3-380M
Oct 26th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.534 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4765T Jun 2nd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-380M Oct 26th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Released | Oct 26th, 2010 |
| $303.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 35 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
