In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i7-4765T is slightly slower than the Core i3-330M and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $400 more expensive!
Core i7-4765T
- Is 3 years and 4 months newer – Jun 02, 2013 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 3 years and 4 months newer
Core i3-330M
- Up to 17% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 215 vs 183 FPS
- Up to 17% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 80% cheaper – $98.95 vs $498.95
- Up to 80% cheaper
- Up to 83% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.46 vs $2.72/FPS
- Up to 83% better value in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i7-4765T vs Core i3-330M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-4765T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
183 FPS
85%
Min 1% FPS
137 FPS
85%
Price, $
$498.95
19%
Value, $/FPS
$2.72/FPS
17%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
215 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
161 FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4765T vs Core i3-330M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4765T vs Core i3-330M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4765T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
67%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4765T Jun 2nd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| $303.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 35 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
