In Atomfall, the Core i7-4765T is slightly slower than the Core i3-10105 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $365 more expensive!
Core i7-4765T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core i3-10105
- Up to 6% faster in Atomfall – 210 vs 199 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Atomfall
- Is 7 years and 9 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Jun 02, 2013
- Is 7 years and 9 months newer
- Up to 73% cheaper – $134.06 vs $498.95
- Up to 73% cheaper
- Up to 75% better value in Atomfall – $0.63 vs $2.50/FPS
- Up to 75% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-4765T vs Core i3-10105: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-4765T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
199 FPS
95%
Min 1% FPS
149 FPS
94%
Price, $
$498.95
26%
Value, $/FPS
$2.5/FPS
25%
Core i3-10105
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
210 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
158 FPS
100%
Price, $
$134.06
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4765T vs Core i3-10105 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4765T vs Core i3-10105 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4765T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
54%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
68%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
60%
Core i3-10105
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4765T Jun 2nd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-10105 Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| $303.00 | MSRP | $122.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
