In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i7-4765T is slightly faster than the Core i3-10100. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $360 more expensive!
Core i7-4765T
- Up to 5% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 183 vs 175 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core i3-10100
- Is 6 years and 10 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jun 02, 2013
- Is 6 years and 10 months newer
- Up to 72% cheaper – $139.00 vs $498.95
- Up to 72% cheaper
- Up to 71% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.79 vs $2.72/FPS
- Up to 71% better value in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i7-4765T vs Core i3-10100: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-4765T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
183 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
137 FPS
100%
Price, $
$498.95
27%
Value, $/FPS
$2.72/FPS
29%
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
175 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
131 FPS
96%
Price, $
$139
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4765T vs Core i3-10100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4765T vs Core i3-10100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4765T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
56%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
70%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
60%
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4765T Jun 2nd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-10100 Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $303.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
