In Deathloop, the Core i7-4750HQ is slightly slower than the Xeon X5650. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4750HQ
- Is 3 years and 2 months newer – May 27, 2013 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 3 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 51% less energy – 47 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 51% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon X5650
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 220 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i7-4750HQ vs Xeon X5650: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4750HQ vs Xeon X5650 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4750HQ vs Xeon X5650 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4750HQ
May 27th, 2013
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Xeon X5650
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.666 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.066 GHz
96%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4750HQ May 27th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X5650 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 27th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | LGA1366 |
47W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD 5200 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
