In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i7-4750HQ is slightly slower than the Xeon E3-1220. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4750HQ
- Is 2 years and 1 month newer – May 27, 2013 vs Apr 03, 2011
- Is 2 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 41% less energy – 47 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 41% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E3-1220
- Up to 6% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 194 vs 183 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i7-4750HQ vs Xeon E3-1220: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4750HQ vs Xeon E3-1220 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4750HQ vs Xeon E3-1220 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4750HQ
May 27th, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
65%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
94%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Xeon E3-1220
Apr 3rd, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4750HQ May 27th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E3-1220 Apr 3rd, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 27th, 2013 | Released | Apr 3rd, 2011 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | LGA1155 |
47 W | Power Consumption | 80 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD 5200 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
