Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms Core i7-4750HQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 1536 days newer than Core i7-4750HQ.
Advantages of Core i7-4750HQ
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 47 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 2% better in HITMAN 3 than Core i7-4750HQ - 197 vs 194 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4750HQ - 32 vs 8 threads
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
197
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.16/FPS
100%
Price, $
$621.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $621.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 282 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • May 27th, 2013
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-4750HQ | vs | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
May 27th, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Crystal Well | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 5200 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |