In Deathloop, the Core i7-4750HQ is slightly slower than the Ryzen 9 5900X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4750HQ
- Consumes up to 55% less energy – 47 vs 105 Watts
- Consumes up to 55% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 9 5900X
- Up to 5% faster in Deathloop – 229 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Deathloop
- Is 7 years and 5 months newer – Nov 05, 2020 vs May 27, 2013
- Is 7 years and 5 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i7-4750HQ vs Ryzen 9 5900X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 9 5900X
Nov 5th, 2020
Average FPS
229 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
172 FPS
100%
Price, $
$269
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.17/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4750HQ vs Ryzen 9 5900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4750HQ vs Ryzen 9 5900X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4750HQ
May 27th, 2013
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
6 MB
9%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
54%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
67%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
50%
Ryzen 9 5900X
Nov 5th, 2020
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4750HQ May 27th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 5900X Nov 5th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 27th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | $549.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | AM4 |
47W | Power Consumption | 105W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 5200 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
