In Atomfall, the Core i7-4750HQ is slightly slower than the Ryzen 5 2600. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4750HQ
- Consumes up to 28% less energy – 47 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 28% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall – 205 vs 199 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 10 months newer – Apr 19, 2018 vs May 27, 2013
- Is 4 years and 10 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-4750HQ vs Ryzen 5 2600: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 5 2600
Apr 19th, 2018
Average FPS
205 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
154 FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4750HQ vs Ryzen 5 2600 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4750HQ vs Ryzen 5 2600 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4750HQ
May 27th, 2013
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
59%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
82%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
55%
Ryzen 5 2600
Apr 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4750HQ May 27th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 2600 Apr 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 27th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | $199.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | AM4 |
47W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 5200 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
