In Atomfall, the Core i7-4750HQ is slightly slower than the Ryzen 3 3200G. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4750HQ
- Consumes up to 28% less energy – 47 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 28% less energy
Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 201 vs 199 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
- Is 6 years and 1 month newer – Jul 07, 2019 vs May 27, 2013
- Is 6 years and 1 month newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-4750HQ vs Ryzen 3 3200G: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
201 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
151 FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.9
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4750HQ vs Ryzen 3 3200G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4750HQ vs Ryzen 3 3200G in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4750HQ
May 27th, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
56%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
80%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4750HQ May 27th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 3 3200G Jul 7th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 27th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | AM4 |
47W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR4 |
| Intel HD 5200 | Integrated GPU | Radeon Vega 8 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
