In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i7-4750HQ is slightly slower than the FX-8320. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4750HQ
- Is 7 months and 2 days newer – May 27, 2013 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 7 months and 2 days newer
- Consumes up to 62% less energy – 47 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 62% less energy
FX-8320
- Up to 8% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 197 vs 182 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i7-4750HQ vs FX-8320: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
197 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
147 FPS
100%
Price, $
$88.1
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4750HQ vs FX-8320 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4750HQ vs FX-8320 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4750HQ
May 27th, 2013
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
57%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
80%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4750HQ May 27th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8320 Oct 23rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 27th, 2013 | Released | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | $169.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | AM3+ |
47 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| Intel HD 5200 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
