In Atomfall, the Core i7-4750HQ is slightly slower than the Core i9-10900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4750HQ
- Consumes up to 28% less energy – 47 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 28% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-10900F
- Up to 11% faster in Atomfall – 219 vs 198 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Atomfall
- Is 6 years and 11 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs May 27, 2013
- Is 6 years and 11 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-4750HQ vs Core i9-10900F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4750HQ vs Core i9-10900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4750HQ vs Core i9-10900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4750HQ
May 27th, 2013
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
6 MB
30%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
62%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
55%
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4750HQ May 27th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 27th, 2013 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | $464.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | LGA1200 |
47 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 5200 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
