In Starfield, the Core i7-4750HQ is slightly slower than the Core i7-920. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4750HQ
- Is 4 years and 6 months newer – May 27, 2013 vs Nov 17, 2008
- Is 4 years and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 47 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 64% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-920
- Up to 1% faster in Starfield – 91 vs 90 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Starfield
Starfield FPS Calculator
Core i7-4750HQ vs Core i7-920: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-920
Nov 17th, 2008
Average FPS
91 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
49 FPS
96%
Price, $
$92.85
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.02/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4750HQ vs Core i7-920 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4750HQ vs Core i7-920 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4750HQ
May 27th, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Core i7-920
Nov 17th, 2008
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.666 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.933 GHz
92%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4750HQ May 27th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-920 Nov 17th, 2008 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 27th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | LGA1366 |
47W | Power Consumption | 130W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD 5200 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
