In Control, the Core i7-4750HQ is slightly slower than the Core i7-13700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4750HQ
- Consumes up to 28% less energy – 47 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 28% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-13700F
- Up to 2% faster in Control – 253 vs 247 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Control
- Is 9 years and 7 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs May 27, 2013
- Is 9 years and 7 months newer
Control FPS Calculator
Core i7-4750HQ vs Core i7-13700F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4750HQ vs Core i7-13700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4750HQ vs Core i7-13700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4750HQ
May 27th, 2013
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
6 MB
20%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
62%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
29%
Core i7-13700F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4750HQ May 27th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-13700F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 27th, 2013 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $359.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | LGA1700 |
47 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 5200 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
