In Deathloop, the Core i7-4750HQ is slightly slower than the Core i7-10700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4750HQ
- Consumes up to 28% less energy – 47 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 28% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-10700F
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop – 222 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop
- Is 6 years and 11 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs May 27, 2013
- Is 6 years and 11 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i7-4750HQ vs Core i7-10700F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
222 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
100%
Price, $
$329.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.48/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4750HQ vs Core i7-10700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4750HQ vs Core i7-10700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4750HQ
May 27th, 2013
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
67%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
55%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4750HQ May 27th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 27th, 2013 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | LGA1200 |
47 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 5200 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
