In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i7-4750HQ is slightly slower than the Core i3-3220T. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4750HQ
- Is 8 months and 22 days newer – May 27, 2013 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 8 months and 22 days newer
Core i3-3220T
- Up to 6% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 245 vs 232 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Consumes up to 26% less energy – 35 vs 47 Watts
- Consumes up to 26% less energy
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i7-4750HQ vs Core i3-3220T: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
183 FPS
100%
Price, $
$189.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4750HQ vs Core i3-3220T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4750HQ vs Core i3-3220T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4750HQ
May 27th, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4750HQ May 27th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-3220T Sep 3rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 27th, 2013 | Released | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | LGA1155 |
| 47 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| Intel HD 5200 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 2500 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
