In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i7-4750HQ is slightly slower than the Celeron G3900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4750HQ
- Consumes up to 8% less energy – 47 vs 51 Watts
- Consumes up to 8% less energy
Celeron G3900
- Up to 4% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 241 vs 232 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Is 2 years and 3 months newer – Sep 01, 2015 vs May 27, 2013
- Is 2 years and 3 months newer
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i7-4750HQ vs Celeron G3900: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
241 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
181 FPS
100%
Price, $
$44.04
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4750HQ vs Celeron G3900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4750HQ vs Celeron G3900 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4750HQ
May 27th, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
75%
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4750HQ May 27th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron G3900 Sep 1st, 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 27th, 2013 | Released | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | LGA1151 |
47 W | Power Consumption | 51 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 5200 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 510 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
