In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i7-4750HQ is slightly slower than the Celeron G1610. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4750HQ
- Is 5 months and 22 days newer – May 27, 2013 vs Dec 03, 2012
- Is 5 months and 22 days newer
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 47 vs 55 Watts
- Consumes up to 15% less energy
Celeron G1610
- Up to 13% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 206 vs 183 FPS
- Up to 13% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i7-4750HQ vs Celeron G1610: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
206 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
154 FPS
100%
Price, $
$49
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4750HQ vs Celeron G1610 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4750HQ vs Celeron G1610 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4750HQ
May 27th, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
77%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4750HQ May 27th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron G1610 Dec 3rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 27th, 2013 | Released | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | LGA1155 |
47 W | Power Consumption | 55 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| Intel HD 5200 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
