Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Core i7-4710MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3208 days newer than Core i7-4710MQ.
Advantages of Core i7-4710MQ
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 47 vs 58 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 38% better in Starfield than Core i7-4710MQ - 72 vs 52 FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
72
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.07/FPS
100%
Price, $
$76.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $76.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 148 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Apr 14th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-4710MQ | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Apr 14th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 58 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |