In Atomfall, the Core i7-4710HQ is slightly faster than the Xeon X5670. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4710HQ
- Up to 5% faster in Atomfall – 202 vs 193 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 16 days newer – Apr 01, 2014 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 4 years and 16 days newer
- Consumes up to 51% less energy – 47 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 51% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon X5670
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-4710HQ vs Xeon X5670: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4710HQ vs Xeon X5670 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4710HQ vs Xeon X5670 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4710HQ
Apr 1st, 2014
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
85%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Xeon X5670
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.933 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
95%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4710HQ Apr 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X5670 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 1st, 2014 | Released | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | LGA1366 |
47 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
